Dr.NateNeph said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
Dr.NateNeph said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth.
Dr.NateNeph said:It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about.
Coming at Dr.NateNeph’s question from a different direction. Whatever the answer turns out to be, the method for getting there is the same: state the assumption, do the arithmetic in public, and invite the correction. That is slower than asserting, and it is the only version that survives being wrong.
One concrete data point for the thread. The boring version of this is the one that works, and the boring version is: measure a baseline, change one variable, wait, measure again under the same conditions. Nobody wants that answer and it is still the answer.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from Dr.NateNeph — and this may be the naive question:
How would you tell the difference between that and the alternative explanation?
Closing the loop on my own question.
Update — tachyphylaxis to the gastric effect, persistence of the appetite effect. Two curves, and I had been watching the wrong one.