🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsBuyer Beware⚠ Fake COAs — March 2026 Page 5

⚠ Fake COAs — March 2026

Dr.CardioMD Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 8:56 AM 54 replies 3,020 viewsPage 5 of 11
hyun_seoul
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Seoul, KR
Nov 7, 2024 at 4:33 AM#21
Dr.SportsMedIN said:
HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean: Purity %: Should be…

Adding a me-too, because a thread of one person's experience is not much use. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.

46 19Dr.ObesityMed, HealthEcon_DC, PedsEndoPhilly and 43 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
mike_mealprep
Member
412
1,890
Jul 2024
Chicago, IL
Nov 9, 2024 at 4:38 AM#22
Dr.SportsMedIN said:
HPLC results interpretation for certificates of analysis: when you get your Janoshik report back, here's what the numbers mean: Purity %: Should be…

Reconstituted peptide stability data for certificates of analysis: I had Janoshik test my reconstituted vial at day 1, day 14, and day 28 stored in the refrigerator.

Day 1: 100.5% purity
Day 14: 99.1% purity
Day 28: 99.5% purity

Minimal degradation over 28 days when properly refrigerated. This confirms the standard 28-day beyond-use date is appropriate. Beyond 28 days, I'd reconstitute a fresh vial to be safe.

47 20newstart_MO, mia_MS2, LeilaHI and 44 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
wendy_avl
Member
245
1,123
Oct 2024
Asheville, NC
Nov 11, 2024 at 4:42 AM#23

One concrete data point for the thread. For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine. Half the figures circulating in this community trace back to a secondary summary that dropped a qualifier.

Last edited: Nov 11, 2024 at 10:42 AM
48 21TomTeleRx, DoseLogDan, SleepFixSam and 45 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards

Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.

Shop Reference Standards
MikeKY_noInsulin
Member
267
1,234
Oct 2024
Louisville, KY
Nov 13, 2024 at 4:44 AM#24

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

Was that from a primary source or from a summary of one?

49 22amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london and 46 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
ingrid_STO
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Stockholm, SE
Nov 15, 2024 at 4:45 AM#25
wendy_avl said:
For anyone reading later: the numbers in this thread are worth checking against a primary source before you act on them, including mine.

Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.

50 23WendyG_ATL, SaraMom3, Dr.MetabolicMD and 47 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
13456711

Similar Threads

⚠ Peptide Sciences SHUT DOWN March 6, 2026 — what happened and what to do now8 replies
⚠ Amino Asylum raided by FDA June 2025 — warehouse seized6 replies
⚠ Swiss Chems FDA warning letter December 2024 — selling unapproved drugs6 replies
⚠ 50+ FDA warning letters sent to peptide vendors in 2025 — full list4 replies
⚠ PeptideMeter exposed: some vendors scoring E grade on basic peptides4 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register