From the other side of the consultation, briefly. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.
Apr 17, 2026 at 7:17 AM#16
Last edited: Apr 17, 2026 at 9:17 AM
22 20NicoleRaleigh, james_edin, FranDenver and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 17, 2026 at 2:37 PM#17
Dr.EndoEP said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Second this. Nothing to add that would improve it.
Last edited: Apr 17, 2026 at 7:37 PM
23 21ben_calgary, patPC_UT, Dr.DermMIA and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Apr 17, 2026 at 9:57 PM#18
Dr.EndoEP said:If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not.
Coming at Dr.EndoEP’s question from a different direction. It helps to say which part of this you are uncertain about. A precise question gets a precise answer; a general one gets everybody’s favourite anecdote.
24 22MikeKY_noInsulin, Dr.RaviCardio, jennifer_SEA and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Sigma-Aldrich — Research-Grade Standards
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsApr 18, 2026 at 5:17 AM#19
One concrete data point for the thread. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.
25 23TirzTom, TrialTracker_MD, JennaRN and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report