Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It helps to ask what evidence would change your mind before you look at any. If nothing would, the discussion is not about evidence, and it is better to say so early than to spend nine posts discovering it.
DataDave said:TomFromTexas said: ...regarding the discontinuation data for cost and coverage...
Agreed, with the usual condition: that holds for the average and this board is a collection of individuals. A population claim and a personal prediction are different things and get quoted interchangeably.
DataDave said:TomFromTexas said: ...regarding the discontinuation data for cost and coverage...
This answered a question I did not know how to ask.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsClinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Moderator note: a couple of off-topic posts removed. Thread quality here is what the rules are for. Keep it up.