SleepDoc_PDX said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
That reframing is the part I needed.
SleepDoc_PDX said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
That reframing is the part I needed.
Adding the clinical framing, because it changes how the question reads. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
PeptideChemSF said:There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Can confirm. Same sequence, different timescale. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
Certified reference materials, analytical reagents, and research-grade standards for peptide verification. Trusted by laboratories worldwide.
Shop Reference StandardsPeptideChemSF said:There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.
Reporting back.
Update: approved on the third attempt after a peer-to-peer. Nothing about my case changed; only who was doing the talking.