🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsMetabolic Health & DiabetesIs it possible to reverse type 2 or am I dreaming — January 2024 Page 2

Is it possible to reverse type 2 or am I dreaming — January 2024

MikeFit_NJ Sat, Feb 7, 2026 at 3:22 PM 6 replies 877 viewsPage 2 of 2
NurseKim_ATL
Senior Member
1,678
7,234
Feb 2024
Atlanta, GA
Feb 8, 2026 at 6:48 AM#6
PharmD_Rodriguez said:
Patient selection optimization for glycaemic control: emerging predictive biomarkers for GLP-1 agonist response include: Biomarker Association…

My labs after 6 months on glycaemic control: A1C 6.1%, fasting glucose 76 mg/dL, fasting insulin 9 uIU/mL. My endo says these are "textbook perfect."

For context, my baseline A1C was 6.7% and fasting glucose was 121 mg/dL. The improvement has been dramatic and consistent.

22 17denise_HTX, raj_cambridge, ingrid_STO and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
kate.chem
VIP Member
3,890
17,654
Dec 2023
California
Feb 8, 2026 at 12:55 PM#7
MikeFit_NJ said:
Fasting glucose improved within weeks and my HbA1c barely moved for three months, which I now understand and did not at the time.

Insulin sensitivity test (HOMA-IR) on glycaemic control — arguably the most important metabolic marker most people aren't tracking:

HOMA-IR = (fasting insulin × fasting glucose) ÷ 405

My numbers: Baseline HOMA-IR = 6.0 (insulin resistant) → Current = 1.0 (insulin sensitive)

Anything above 2.0 indicates insulin resistance. The goal is below 1.5. GLP-1 agonists address the root metabolic dysfunction, not just the symptoms. This is why they work so much better than calorie restriction alone.

21 16VanRx_Mike, steve_okc, dave_SLC and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.AddMedPHL
Senior Member
1,234
6,234
Mar 2024
Philadelphia, PA
Feb 8, 2026 at 7:02 PM#8
NurseKim_ATL said:
My labs after 6 months on glycaemic control: A1C 6.1%, fasting glucose 76 mg/dL, fasting insulin 9 uIU/mL.

Glycemic variability as the key metric for glycaemic control success: my coefficient of variation (CV) on CGM dropped from 40% to 21%. Target is <36%, with <30% being ideal.

Why this matters more than average glucose: large glucose swings cause oxidative stress, endothelial damage, and promote advanced glycation end-products (AGEs). A flat glucose line at 95 mg/dL is metabolically healthier than oscillating between 60 and 160, even if the average is the same.

Last edited: Feb 8, 2026 at 9:02 PM
20 15mike.trainer_LA, sarah_nash92, FitDadDave and 17 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
tyler_CSCS
Member
567
2,567
Jun 2024
Phoenix, AZ
Feb 9, 2026 at 1:09 AM#9

A narrower follow-up, since the general answer is now clear:

What would you measure differently if you were starting again?

19 14amy_econ_NJ, bbq_ray_KC, oliver_london and 16 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
MikeFit_NJ
Senior Member
1,567
6,543
Apr 2024
New Jersey
Feb 10, 2026 at 6:33 AM#10
Dr.AddMedPHL said:
Glycemic variability as the key metric for glycaemic control success: my coefficient of variation (CV) on CGM dropped from 40% to 21%.

PCOS success story with glycaemic control: as someone with polycystic ovary syndrome, this medication has been transformative beyond weight loss.

After 12 months: periods became regular for the first time in ever, testosterone levels normalized, acne cleared significantly, and — unexpectedly — my hormonal symptoms have almost completely resolved.

GLP-1 agonists address the insulin resistance at the root of PCOS. For PCOS patients, this isn't "just" a weight loss drug — it's treating our underlying metabolic dysfunction.

15 13Dr.EndoIndy, tom_AK, josh_phd_bmore and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

SUSTAIN-6 to SELECT — the cardiovascular evidence timeline14 replies
GLP-1 and insulin resistance — HOMA-IR improvement data17 replies
Metabolic syndrome reversal criteria — how GLP-1 addresses all 55 replies
A1C target achievement rates — sema vs tirz comparison8 replies
SURPASS-CVOT: tirzepatide cardiovascular outcomes trial design3 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register