Has anyone dealt with receptor internalization and recycling?

Dr.PathRoch said:

The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.

Second this.

kate.chem said:

Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.

This is exactly what I could not find anywhere else. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.

If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.

SarahChen_PharmD said:

The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either.

Same experience, arrived at from the opposite direction. Posting only so the count is not one.

Moderator note: leaving this open. It is being argued well and the disagreement is the useful part.