Dr.ObesityMed said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Dr.ObesityMed said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
This is my experience too, for whatever a second data point is worth. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Dr.ObesityMed said:The version of this that has an answer is narrower than the version being asked.
Coming at Dr.ObesityMed’s question from a different direction. Order of operations matters more than any single choice here: establish a baseline, change one thing, wait long enough for it to express itself, then measure again under the same conditions.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne thing that is still open after Dr.ObesityMed’s answer:
What would you measure differently if you were starting again?
OP back with an update, since a thread like this is useless without one.
Update: the thing I was blaming turned out not to be the cause. Leaving the original post as written rather than editing it, so the mistake stays visible for whoever searches this next.