kate.chem said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.
kate.chem said:Practical: whatever you change, write down the date and the reason.
Bookmarking. The distinction being drawn above is the one nobody else makes. Printing the relevant bit and taking it with me.
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. No action needed from anybody.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View Resultschris_chi24 said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. The detail I would add is minor and it is already implied above.
chris_chi24 said:Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. If two explanations both fit, the useful question is which one predicts something the other does not. That is answerable; arguing about which sounds more plausible is not.