Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice. The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person. Both are real; they answer different questions and get quoted as if they were the same one.
Dec 19, 2025 at 11:16 AM#16
32 7mia_MS2, LeilaHI, marcus_mpls and 29 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dec 19, 2025 at 1:36 PM#17
Dr.EndoIndy said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Filing a mild objection. Mild because I might be wrong; an objection because nobody has addressed the case that does not fit. Pushing back on the consensus forming here. Consistency is not the same as correctness, and a board that agrees with itself quickly is usually agreeing with the first person who sounded certain.
31 6AttorneyGrant, DebRD_ATL, KristenIndy and 28 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dec 19, 2025 at 3:57 PM#18
Dr.EndoIndy said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.
30 5AmyNC_wife, SkepticalSean, Dr.CardioMD and 27 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsDec 19, 2025 at 6:18 PM#19
Dr.EndoIndy said:The distinction that resolves most of these threads is between what is true on average and what is true for one person.
Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them.
29 4LibrarianMeg, bri_stats, pete_manc_UK and 26 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report