Dr.RaviCardio said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
Dr.RaviCardio said:Start from the measurement rather than the conclusion.
This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
HPLC_Greg said:Keep the original post as written when you update it, and add the correction underneath.
There is a second half to this that has not been said yet. There is a difference between no evidence and evidence of no effect, and this subject is one where the two get swapped freely in both directions.
Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.
If somebody has the primary source to hand I would rather cite it than paraphrase it.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsFollowing on from HPLC_Greg — and this may be the naive question:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
Moderator note: two posts asking for a source have been merged into one. Please search the thread before asking again. Carry on.