BethLabQueen said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
Same pattern here, and in the same order. I had assumed I was the exception until I read this.
BethLabQueen said:Update — I was wrong in the opening post, specifically about the direction.
Adding the part of the answer the thread has not reached. The honest answer is that the effect is real, the magnitude is contested, and the individual variation is larger than either. Those three things can all be true at once, and most arguments here are two people holding different parts of that.
The figures, for anyone assembling their own picture. Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look. It is a small discipline and it changes what you notice.
Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.
View ResultsOne thing that is still open after BethLabQueen’s answer:
Did your prescriber agree with that reading, and if not what was their objection?
Dr.PeteFamMed said:Say what you would expect to see if you were wrong, before you look.
This is where I part company with the consensus forming above. This treats a plausible mechanism as a demonstrated one. Plausible is where you start looking, not where you stop.
Happy to go further on any of that.