🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsVendor ReviewsI made a spreadsheet comparing vendor COAs — anyone have experience? Page 7

I made a spreadsheet comparing vendor COAs — anyone have experience?

JennaRN Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 2:29 AM 36 replies 2,800 viewsPage 7 of 8
mark_tokyo
Member
456
1,890
Jun 2024
Tokyo, JP
Apr 19, 2024 at 11:43 AM#31
JennaRN said:
Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing.

Pushing back on JennaRN here. I would resist the confidence. Half of what this board was certain about two years ago has since been quietly dropped, and nobody went back to correct the threads.

Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.

25 0pete_manc_UK, anna.melb_AU, mark_tokyo and 22 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SandraNC_45
Member
312
1,345
Sep 2024
Charlotte, NC
Apr 21, 2024 at 12:50 PM#32
JennaRN said:
Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing.

That is right for the common case. Whether it is right for the case being asked about depends on a detail that has not been given.

24 24james_edin, FranDenver, Dr.BariatricHTX and 21 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
SallyK_inj
Member
567
2,345
Jul 2024
Iowa
Apr 23, 2024 at 1:56 PM#33
JennaRN said:
Purity and content being different measurements was the piece I was missing.

Thank you — that is the clearest version of this I have read, and I have read a lot of them. I will report back once I have actually tried it.

23 23oliver_london, tane_welly, Dr.PathRoch and 20 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

PeptideMeter — Independent Peptide Analytics

Community-driven peptide testing and vendor rating platform. Transparent results. Unbiased analysis. Trusted by thousands.

View Results
hyun_seoul
Member
345
1,456
Jul 2024
Seoul, KR
Apr 25, 2024 at 3:01 PM#34

From the other side of the consultation, briefly. It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false. If nothing would look different, it is not a claim about the world and no amount of discussion will settle it.

22 22BariatricNurseD, MASHdoc_SA, GenomicsKate and 19 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
JakeBK_lifts
Member
523
2,345
Jul 2024
Brooklyn, NY
Apr 27, 2024 at 4:04 PM#35
hyun_seoul said:
It is worth asking what the claim would look like if it were false.

This matches mine closely enough to be worth saying so out loud. Nothing to add that would improve it.

21 21DataDave, Dr.GutHealth, amsterdam_pete and 18 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

[REVIEW] WWB — 8 months, 6 orders, all Janoshik tested7 replies
[REVIEW] QSC — consistency and pricing, 10+ orders deep5 replies
[REVIEW] GGPeps — 6 orders, all independently tested3 replies
Which vendor should I go with? Side-by-side comparison3 replies
How do you vet a new vendor? My quality checklist9 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register