Dr.KarenChen said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
No disagreement, though it depends on where somebody is starting from, and this thread has been assuming a starting point nobody stated.
Ask again with the specifics and you will get a better answer than this one.
SandraNC_45 said:Agreed, with a caveat about community reputation: it is a lagging indicator.
Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion. Taking it to my next appointment.
Dr.KarenChen said:Worth answering the question that was asked rather than the one behind it.
Pushing back on Dr.KarenChen here. The objection nobody has made: this only works if the measurement is doing what we assume it is doing, and that assumption has not been tested here.
I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.
Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.
Verify Your PeptidesEst. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.
Browse GL BiochemOne concrete data point for the thread. Worth stating the units and the reference range whenever you post a number here. A large fraction of the apparent disagreement in these threads is two people using different units and both being right.