[REVIEW] GGPeps — looking for input

Dr.SleepRoch said:

The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.

Agreed, and the size of the effect matters as much as its existence. Something real and small gets treated here as though it were real and decisive.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

FitDadDave said:

Agreed, with a caveat about community reputation: it is a lagging indicator.

Thank you for spelling out the reasoning rather than just the conclusion.

Dr.SleepRoch said:

The useful move here is to separate what is established from what is widely repeated.

Careful with the causal language. Two things moving together in a period when five things changed is not a mechanism, and stating it as one makes the thread less useful to somebody reading it later.

Adding the numbers, since they settle part of this. One practical note: write down what you did and when, before you need it. Reconstructing a timeline from memory three months later is how people end up unable to answer the one question that would have resolved it.

I would rather be corrected than agreed with, if it comes to it.

Moderator note: reminder that nothing in this thread is medical advice, and that clinical claims need a source. No action needed from anybody.