🍪 The GLP Lounge uses cookies to improve your experience, analyze traffic, and personalize content. By continuing to use this site, you agree to our Cookie Policy.
Evidence-based GLP-1 & peptide discussion since 2023
ForumsNutrition & SupplementationProtein powder rankings — best options for GLP-1 users

Protein powder rankings — best options for GLP-1 users

paul_denver Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 8:54 PM 4 replies 165 viewsPage 1 of 1
paul_denver
Member
723
3,234
May 2024
Denver, CO
Jun 4, 2026 at 8:54 PM#1

Counting rather than debating, for once. The debate can happen underneath.

I tracked honestly for two weeks and averaged 68g of protein against a target of about 120g. That gap is the whole problem and no meal plan I have found is written for it.

What I am after is how people are hitting a protein target on a genuinely suppressed appetite, because volume is the binding constraint rather than willingness.

Roughly, people seem to land in one of these:

  • Held where they were and waited it out
  • Changed one variable and kept everything else fixed
  • Changed several things at once and cannot now attribute the result
  • Stopped and reassessed from a clean baseline

Say which and say why — the why is the useful half.

18 13Dr.LeslieOBGYN, MikeNYC_runner and 15 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
NeuroNate
Senior Member
2,890
16,789
Dec 2023
Chicago, IL
Jun 4, 2026 at 10:08 PM#2

Answering the narrow version, because the broad one does not have a single answer. On a suppressed appetite the winning strategy is protein density per unit of volume, not per calorie. Isolate powders, Greek yoghurt and cottage cheese, egg whites, lean fish, and tinned tuna all deliver a lot of protein in a small physical volume. Front-load it: appetite is usually least suppressed in the first hours after waking and worst on the day or two after dosing, so get the majority in early in the day and early in the week.

That is the short version; the long version is somebody else's post.

17 12wendy_avl, jason_paloalto, Dr.LeslieOBGYN and 14 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
paige_pharma
Member
289
1,234
Sep 2024
Omaha, NE
Jun 4, 2026 at 11:22 PM#3
NeuroNate said:
On a suppressed appetite the winning strategy is protein density per unit of volume, not per calorie.

True, and anyone with reduced kidney function needs that target set by a clinician rather than a forum. High protein is safe in normal kidneys and is not automatically safe in impaired ones.

16 11adam_van, Dr.SurgeonPGH, rachel_ABQ and 13 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Janoshik Analytical — Independent Testing

Trusted third-party HPLC & mass spectrometry analysis. Verify peptide purity with the lab the community relies on. Independent. Accurate. Transparent.

Verify Your Peptides

GL Biochem (Shanghai) Ltd. — Direct Manufacturer

Est. 1998. The synthesis house behind the vials you send for testing. ISO 9001 and cGMP certified, 1,500+ staff, batch-specific COA with every order.

Browse GL Biochem
marcus_mpls
Member
234
1,123
Nov 2024
Minneapolis, MN
Jun 5, 2026 at 12:36 AM#4
paul_denver said:
I tracked honestly for two weeks and averaged 68g of protein against a target of about 120g.

Can confirm the pattern paul_denver describes. The RDA is the wrong reference and it is worth understanding why. 0.8 g/kg is the intake at which nitrogen balance is not negative in healthy weight-stable adults — a floor for deficiency prevention, not an optimum, and derived in a population that is not in a deficit. In a substantial energy deficit, protein requirement rises because amino acids are being oxidised for energy and because muscle protein synthesis is blunted. The literature on preserving lean mass during weight loss lands around 1.4 to 2.0 g/kg of reference body weight, which is roughly two to two and a half times the RDA.

15 10Dr.PathRoch, mona_PHX, andrew_nyc and 12 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report
Dr.SleepRoch
Senior Member
1,123
5,678
Apr 2024
Rochester, MN
Jun 5, 2026 at 7:43 AM#5

Clinical perspective, offered as context rather than as advice.

DEXA scan update relevant to protein intake:

Scanned at months 0, 6, and 12. Here are the body comp numbers:

BaselineMonth 6Month 12
Total mass268 lbs243 lbs205 lbs
Fat mass108 lbs68 lbs55 lbs
Lean mass161 lbs151 lbs152 lbs
Body fat %45%31%24%

Lean mass preserved — actually GAINED 1-2 lbs thanks to progressive overload + 1.5g/kg protein. The protein intake discussion needs to include body comp data, not just scale weight.

14 9roxy_nash, tony_orlando, Dr.NephBHM_UK and 11 others
Reply Quote Save Share Report

Similar Threads

Protein requirements on GLP-1: systematic review of RDA vs optimal intake8 replies
Micronutrient deficiency risk on GLP-1 — B12, D, iron, zinc, folate10 replies
High-protein meal plans for GLP-1 users — 1500-2000 kcal options9 replies
Meal prep Sunday — weekly high-protein recipes thread9 replies
Creatine monohydrate + GLP-1 — safety and lean mass preservation data14 replies
ForumsNewTrendingMembersAccount

Log In

Forgot password?
No account? Register